You know, I tend to address the trivial and mundane on this blog and generally avoid political and religious posts. I figure some of the stuff I say is enough of a lightning rod, why press my luck? I just can’t keep my mouth shut any longer, however, about one major news story occurring right now.
What the hell is with NASA?
I will say at the outset that I have a very limited understanding of the Space Program and what little I do know comes from mainstream media and by picking the brain of a someone I know with a strong background in astronomy. I do not claim, by any stretch, to fully comprehend the intricacies of the Space Shuttle Program or the Space Program overall. I have read enough, however, to be thoroughly disgusted.
As is most of the nation, I am watching the events surrounding the Space Shuttle Discovery unfold with a mixture of fear and bewilderment. I fear tremendously for the lives and safety of the crew currently docked at the International Space Station and I am bewildered at the utter lack of intelligence displayed by NASA. I’ve really been on the fence about this whole topic, given the fact that I am woefully ignorant of the specifics but reading this article really shoved me over to the I-can’t-believe-I’m-reading-this side of things.
"[Astronauts] Steve Robinson and Soichi Noguchi used ordinary household items — a
caulk gun and a spatula — to try techniques developed after the
Columbia tragedy in repairing shuttle tiles and reinforced carbon
carbon panels, the material that sustains most of the heat on a space
shuttle’s re-entry."
American taxpayers spent over one billion dollars to send a crew into space so they could use a caulk gun and a spatula to fix potentially life threatening damage to a shuttle that never should have flown in the first place? A caulk gun and a spatula?? I used more sophisticated tools than that to fix my birdhouse.
While still reeling from that piece of news, I read this article that outlines the (currently known) series of misjudgments leading up to Discovery’s launch.
"At a closed-door meeting [on June 24th], senior shuttle managers had
ruled that the chances that debris from the giant external fuel tank
would strike the Discovery at liftoff – in the kind of accident that
doomed the Columbia and its seven astronauts in February 2003 – had
been reduced to ‘acceptable levels.’"
I would like to know how these senior shuttle managers quantified "acceptable risk." A 1 in 10 chance the crew would come home alive? 1 in 100? Maybe 1 in 1,000,000? Of course I understand that space flight is inherently risky. Of course I understand that no one set out to put this crew in harm’s way. Of course I understand that things beyond NASA’s control will occur. This, however, was foreseeable risk. In fact, it wasn’t a question of if damage would occur during the launch, but how much.
"After the accident, NASA examined all possible sources of liftoff
debris, eventually identifying more than 170. Engineers recognized that
they could not eliminate all risk from debris, but they could do a much
better job of reducing it."
This article goes on to say that NASA, at the initiation of the Shuttle Program, had a stringent policy that allowed for NO falling debris. The goal seemed unreachable so NASA, in a strategy I can not begin to understand, simply chose to ignore it. Even after an unwillingness to follow their own policy lead to the Challenger tragedy in 2003, they launched Discovery anyway by managing to convince an independent safety committee that they had "raised the level of safety in general." I’ll remember that argument if I ever need to talk my way out of a sticky situation ("Yes, officer, I know this the fourth time I’ve rear ended someone but, hey, at least I was wearing my seatbelt this time!").
Is all of this politically motivated as Bush rushes to get Americans to the Moon and then to Mars ahead of anyone else? Is this a matter of too many cooks in the kitchen? Or not enough? I honestly don’t know. I just want this crew to land safely and then I never want to hear the words "Space Shuttle" ever again.
Posted by Lisa Hoover 



