NASA quantifies “acceptable risk”

July 30, 2005

You know, I tend to address the trivial and mundane on this blog and generally avoid political and religious posts. I figure some of the stuff I say is enough of a lightning rod, why press my luck? I just can’t keep my mouth shut any longer, however, about one major news story occurring right now.

What the hell is with NASA?

I will say at the outset that I have a very limited understanding of the Space Program and what little I do know comes from mainstream media and by picking the brain of a someone I know with a strong background in astronomy. I do not claim, by any stretch, to fully comprehend the intricacies of the Space Shuttle Program or the Space Program overall. I have read enough, however, to be thoroughly disgusted.

As is most of the nation, I am watching the events surrounding the Space Shuttle Discovery unfold with a mixture of fear and bewilderment. I fear tremendously for the lives and safety of the crew currently docked at the International Space Station and I am bewildered at the utter lack of intelligence displayed by NASA. I’ve really been on the fence about this whole topic, given the fact that I am woefully ignorant of the specifics but reading this article really shoved me over to the I-can’t-believe-I’m-reading-this side of things.

"[Astronauts] Steve Robinson and Soichi Noguchi used ordinary household items — a
caulk gun and a spatula — to try techniques developed after the
Columbia tragedy in repairing shuttle tiles and reinforced carbon
carbon panels, the material that sustains most of the heat on a space
shuttle’s re-entry."

American taxpayers spent over one billion dollars to send a crew into space so they could use a caulk gun and a spatula to fix potentially life threatening damage to a shuttle that never should have flown in the first place? A caulk gun and a spatula?? I used more sophisticated tools than that to fix my birdhouse.

While still reeling from that piece of news, I read this article that outlines the (currently known) series of misjudgments leading up to Discovery’s launch.

"At a closed-door meeting [on June 24th], senior shuttle managers had
ruled that the chances that debris from the giant external fuel tank
would strike the Discovery at liftoff – in the kind of accident that
doomed the Columbia and its seven astronauts in February 2003 – had
been reduced to ‘acceptable levels.’"

I would like to know how these senior shuttle managers quantified "acceptable risk." A 1 in 10 chance the crew would come home alive? 1 in 100? Maybe 1 in 1,000,000? Of course I understand that space flight is inherently risky. Of course I understand that no one set out to put this crew in harm’s way. Of course I understand that things beyond NASA’s control will occur. This, however, was foreseeable risk. In fact, it wasn’t a question of if damage would occur during the launch, but how much.

"After the accident, NASA examined all possible sources of liftoff
debris, eventually identifying more than 170. Engineers recognized that
they could not eliminate all risk from debris, but they could do a much
better job of reducing it."

This article goes on to say that NASA, at the initiation of the Shuttle Program, had a stringent policy that allowed for NO falling debris. The goal seemed unreachable so NASA, in a strategy I can not begin to understand, simply chose to ignore it. Even after an unwillingness to follow their own policy lead to the Challenger tragedy in 2003, they launched Discovery anyway by managing to convince an independent safety committee that they had "raised the level of safety in general." I’ll remember that argument if I ever need to talk my way out of a sticky situation ("Yes, officer, I know this the fourth time I’ve rear ended someone but, hey, at least I was wearing my seatbelt this time!").

Is all of this politically motivated as Bush rushes to get Americans to the Moon and then to Mars ahead of anyone else? Is this a matter of too many cooks in the kitchen? Or not enough? I honestly don’t know. I just want this crew to land safely and then I never want to hear the words "Space Shuttle" ever again.


Keep Back 500 Feet

July 30, 2005

It’s just that kind of day:

  • I tried to signal my intent to change lanes today by repeatedly flicking the switch that locks my car doors and become frustrated when my turn signal wouldn’t flash.
  • I’m making cheesy brat stew in the slow cooker so this morning I dumped all the gooey ingredients in the pot, including cream soup and copious amounts of cheddar cheese. I looked everywhere for the cooker’s removable cord before realizing it was still in the pot underneath all the food.
  • I was buying more hermit crabs for my son to make up for his recent loss and was sorting through the tank at the pet store picking up empty shells. At least I thought they were empty. Having two crabs suddenly cling to my thumb made me realize otherwise.
  • I received my replacement cell phone and was getting my old one packaged up to mail back as per the company’s instructions. I set out the bubble wrap, some old newspaper, and some styrofoam peanuts to protect it on its way back to California. Then I promptly dropped the phone on my parquet floor where it shattered into six hundred pieces.

And the day is only half over.

I’m scared.


10th planet? Not so fast

July 30, 2005

Apparently there’s a 10th planet. Of course, astronomers said the same thing in March of last year too but, hey, I guess everyone’s a little preoccupied right now, eh? If this does indeed turn out to be a new planet, I have a couple of comments about it.

Astronomers have no right to change stuff on us now. They’ve said nine planets, so nine it shall be. The Blues Clues Planet Song cannot be changed just to accommodate a group of guys who didn’t get it right the first time (You’ll notice I said guys. It has to be. Women would have stopped after "discovering" the third planet, knowing that finding any more would just prolong the agony of making dioramic shadow boxes for the kids’ science fairs).

A while back, I boned up on basic astronomy and NOWHERE is there any mention that astronomers could just come along and change the rules halfway through the game. Right now, when my boys ask me about planets I sound SO knowledgeable ("Well, son, the sun’s a hot star…mercury’s hot too…Venus is the brightest planet") and you parents know what I’m saying here. I can fake my way through it now but what am I supposed to do if the science guys continue to up the ante? What if they decide there is actually seventy-four planets? Do you know how long that Blues Clues song will have to be?!

And tell me this: who decides there gets to be a 10th planet? Whoever wins the rock-paper-scissors round robin at the space-geek meeting? Congress (no, wait, they’re too busy right now peeling each others heads out of their collective asses)? Nobody asked the parents of the world if it was okay with us since now we have to scramble to relearn everything before the kids start asking more questions.

I did have a moment of zen about this, though. As I was reading all this information today, I got to wondering: what constitutes a planet? I mean, how come this big rock gets elevated to planet status when other chunks of space mass are regarded as meteors (or, even more of a blow to the esteem, the diminutive "meteorite")?

Apparently, even the space guys themselves can’t agree on terminology. According to today’s CNN article, there isn’t even a concrete definition of "planet" anywhere on the books. Hey, astronomy guys, once you sort this out you may find that really only eight planets meet your definition. If that’s the case, you can invent all the new songs, okay? Call Nick Jr. They’re waiting to hear from you.


I need your advice

July 30, 2005

Paper or plastic?

Okay, no, just kidding.

All right, my popsicles, it’s time to come to the aid of your favorite this blogger. I need some advice. My 7 year old has a nasty habit and I need it to stop. He whines incessantly. It seems like it’s non-stop, 24 hours a day and I’m about to lose my mind (or have his vocal cords removed). I googled "how to stop your child from whining" but all I got was a lot of pop psychology crap about how it starts. I need to know how it stops.

What’s in this for you? My undying affection. My eternal gratefulness. And, as an added bonus, I’ll be able to get back to posting cheeky stories about home repair and obnoxious store clerks instead of spending my time stuffing cotton in my ears to staunch the bleeding.

Leave your advice in the comments or email me here.

Thanks. You’re the best.


Good things come in lots of packages

July 28, 2005

God, how I hate sweeping generalizations.

Researchers at University College London have determined that the best way to win a woman’s heart is to offer "…expensive but worthless gifts, such as dinner and theater trips, [because] the male pays no cost if the invitation isn’t accepted." They go on to say that it’s a safe way for a man to appear generous without actually risking anything. If a woman turns him down for a date, he’s out nothing. If she accepts, he can dazzle her by tossing around money left and right.

I guess I can understand their premise and even their conclusion since it makes some good points. However, I was disgusted by this sentence: "… girls won’t be impressed with cheap gifts."

Oh, really? Well, they forgot to interview me. I happen to be very impressed with cheap gifts. No, I’m not suggesting I’d like a box of generic oatmeal for my next birthday  (September…there’s still time for you all to shop). I’m saying that a gift doesn’t have to be expensive to be meaningful. I was raised better than that, for chrissake. Many years ago, I received a handmade plaque with a small engraved brass plate glued to it that signified a major accomplishment that I was proud of. The thing probably cost all of $20 to make but it was special to me. I was once given a gorgeous necklace that had simulated stones instead of the real thing. Was I offended? Of course not. I appreciated that care had been taken to think about what would please me, not what would buy me.

I am not the fuzzy-bear, stuffed animal type. Yet, on my dresser sits a stuffed monkey that J gave me. Expensive? No. Meaningful? Definitely. I have four yellow jelly beans sealed in a Tupperware container, leftovers from a gift of a larger bag of candy he presented to me exactly when I needed it most. I’m sure buying me a bag of jellybeans didn’t exactly break the bank. I have pictures he has drawn me that mean more than any Miro print he could ever purchase.

To be sure, now and in the past, I have been "dazzled" with expensive gifts and beautiful jewelry but I am equally impressed with less expensive things as well. I have had wonderful things come of being taken to dinner at fancy prix fixe restaurants as well as having a first date at a Taco Bell. Guess I’m just funny that way.

So, researchers at UCL: be careful of over generalizing women. It’s unfair and it does a disservice to us, not to mention the men who want to impress us. Hey, here’s an idea: how about if you do a study on how women react to men who are able to just "be themselves"?


The bus stops here

July 27, 2005

Every morning my kids bail out the door and run three houses down to wait in the neighbor’s driveway for their ride to camp.

Their ride is…

Read the rest of this entry »


Froot Loopy

July 27, 2005

In a fit of grocery shopping madness yesterday, I actually bought my kids a box of Froot Loops. I think sugared cereal is a gift from the devil so I usually compromise by allowing them to have Kix, Cheerios or some other boring stuff. They may feel deprived but at least they’ll have something to talk about with their therapists in years to come. They’re pretty good about eating fruit each morning so once in a while I give in and get them  something special to rot out their teeth. I will confess, however, that I bought this particular cereal because it professes to have "1/3 less sugar than regular Froot Loops!"

First, how gullible do they think I am? "1/3 less" might be a good thing in most cases but when "regular" Froot Loops have enough sugar in them to throw all of Nevada into a diabetic coma from one bowl, saying this box has 1/3 less sugar is like saying Karl Rove has his head 1/3 of the way up his ass. After a while, it just ceases to matter.

Second, why can’t this cereal company spell? Shouldn’t it be Froot Loupes? (I know, it’s not punny).

This morning, half dead from lack of sleep and half nauseous from nine cups of coffee, I reminded my son to "eat a banana or something after he finished dressing."

"But Mommy," he said. "I already ate a banana, a pear, a peach and some grapes!"

I froze in my tracks. Nirvana! My son was finally willing to eat something healthy without bribery! Bliss!

"I ate my Froot Loops!" he proudly declared.

ARGH!


And when it rings, I get cappuccino

July 26, 2005

Got time for a cell phone story?

Good.

Last week I hustled out to the minivan first thing in the morning so Visiting Mother and I could do some power shopping. Armed with my purse, coffee, and cell phone, I was ready to hit Victoria’s Secret like the Band of Brothers on D-Day. I put my purse on the floor, the coffee in the cup holder and the phone in the ashtray next to it then ferried my kids to camp, barely slowing down at the front door ("Hey, Miss Jamie, sign the kids in for me, will ya? I’m going shopping!"…I don’t get out much).

As I drove through the parking lot I hit a pothole large enough to hide a small Masai village and coffee sloshed everywhere. I stuffed a bunch of napkins in the ashtray to mop up the mess, grabbed my stuff and went in the store. When my phone rang a while later, it smelled suspiciously like mocha frappe but I ignored it.

Imagine my surprise an hour later when the darn thing wouldn’t work at all. Gee, I wonder why? My cell phone provider had thoughtfully placed a store right around the corner so I went in and told them my phone had "suddenly stopped working for no apparent reason." The dingleweed behind the counter punched buttons for ten minutes before informing me…my phone didn’t work. NO?! Really?!?

He told me I was welcome to leave it with him for the day and they’d see what they could do about it so I asked him for a loaner in the meanwhile. You’d have thought I asked him for a spoon so I could cook some heroin at the counter. He told me they didn’t offer loaners but I was welcome to come back in a couple hours to see if they’d fixed the problem. No good, I told him, my son was sick and I needed to be reachable. I offered to just buy a new phone but he said I couldn’t do that without paying full price for it. Yep, I’ve been a customer for a long time and paid them enough money that by now i should own part of the company but nooooo…. I didn’t warrant a discount on a new phone until I’d had this one 18 months. Of course, when the person next to me told the other sales rep he wasn’t a customer, they offered him a free phone, complimentary headset, new phone charger, belt holster and free lap dances for a year at the strip joint across town.

In the meantime, Dingleweed sent the phone in back for a quick once over by the Tech-Gods. One of them came back out and said the "moisture indicators were pink" (my phone was pregnant?). I feigned surprise even though the Tech said he suddenly felt a need to visit Starbucks. He also mentioned it was beyond repair but, because I had insurance, the company would mail me out a new one and then cancel the policy because I actually used it. (It’s true.) Figuring my time was limited before they got really sick and tired of me, I decided to add another line to my account, forward my phone to the new line and let them mail me the replacement this week. Once I receive it, I’ll use my 14 day "buyer’s remorse" window and cancel the additional line.

So far, it seems to be working out. The only problem is that they gave me the coolest damn free phone to go with the new account. And I don’t want to give it back.


Freud? Jung? Buehler? Anyone?

July 25, 2005

I’m feeling funky and not in a take-me-disco-dancing sort of way. It’s more like a relentless, fuzzy, paralyzed sort of way. I can’t clear my head enough to get any real work done so blogging seems like a good time waster option.

My mother’s visit knocked me off course a little bit. In a nice way, but…still. Though we talk every day via email or phone, there’s nothing like a bottle of wine and lots of alone time to make me let down my guard and spill all my secrets. I talked my fool head off. We talked about the past, the present and the future in ways I haven’t done in…umm…ever.

I didn’t want to discuss my divorce with my mother (she was all happiness and glee when I announced it last year) but I knew it was something I had to do. Besides, she said she’d ground me and take away my car keys if we didn’t. I’ve spoken to virtually no one about it because, well, what does one say? Practically everyone is divorced these days and there’s nothing new I can add to the topic so I don’t bother. That doesn’t mean, however, my subconscious doesn’t babble at me. The farther away I get from it, the more I know that not only was leaving my husband the right thing to do, I see that I should have done it eons earlier. In fact, I should have listened to all those people way back when who urged me to run like hell before I put on that long white gown. I don’t feel like a failure and I don’t feel any guilt about the divorce but I have been struggling to figure out why I care so little about the union that gave me my three beautiful sons. I think it boils down to feeling guilty for not feeling guilty. I simply don’t care about my former marriage or view it as any more of a loss than I did when my sneakers got chewed by the dog. That’s bizarre because I don’t view marriage, overall, as a throw-away institution. I don’t see it as an outdated, antiquated notion whose time has come and gone. I think last week I came to realize that I need to stop beating myself up for not feeling bad about ending something that was so obviously wrong. I should enjoy the relief, not keep wearing a hair shirt just because I think I ought.

Then there’s the present. Wow. We had to talk about that. How are my kids doing? Do they seem well adjusted? Do I seem well adjusted? How about my cats? Do they seem happy (the dog is happy in perpetuity)? Yes. Very much so.

And the future. No crystal balls, only conjecture. Enter your favorite wheat-chaff analogy here.

Which brings me to today and my current state of paralysis. I feel like I ran a marathon last week. The excitement of my mother’s visit, my son’s minor surgery (minor by medical standards, major for Mommy), a flurry of work I need to get to, the thrill of seeing something I was particularly proud of in hold-in-your-hand newsprint…is it any wonder I need a nap? Hopefully I will be on my game tomorrow. If not, I’m sure you’ll hear all about it.

Blogs. Gotta love ‘em.


Batty

July 25, 2005

My mother loves to kid around, particularly when she can involve one of my kids in the joke. Occasionally, I don’t take either one of them as seriously as I ought to. I learned my lesson.

A few days ago, I ambled over to my desk chair at the ridiculous our of 5 a.m. only to find my mother and oldest son already awake. I hadn’t had coffee yet so I pretty much ignored them until something they said floated through the haze in my brain.

"You found what? WHERE?….No. Stop. It’s too early for jokes, you guys. Leave me alone. I have work to do."

In an effort to prove they weren’t teasing me, dammit if they didn’t bring me a freakin’ live bat they were holding hostage under an overturned glass. There are days it does not pay to get out of bed.

As it turned out, they’d discovered the little vampire earlier that morning (how much earlier does it get than 5 a.m., one wonders?). Hurting it was out of the question so rather than smacking it with a broom (and I’m not saying I would have), they threw a blanket over it when it landed on the floor. It must have been quite a sight to behold: a seven year old and his grandmother chasing a flying thing around a room, burrowing under a blanket, scooping it into a glass (my favorite glass!) and then staring at it until I woke up. I’m surprised they didn’t name it.

All in all, the thing was kind of cute. In a creepy, hairy, fanged kind of way.

We released it into the wild (well, our backyard) and it did what any people-fearing, flying, fruit-eating, freaky creature would do. It came back the next night. Now, you’re probably asking how we know it was the same one. The truth is, we don’t. It’s conjecture, but when you’re considering the possibility of having an attic full of guests you didn’t invite, you prefer to think it’s the same bat, over and over again. Right? Right.

Armed with a tennis racket, wooden spikes and necklaces made of garlic, J and I marched up to the attic and went a-hunting. Though there were no actual bats to be found, we did locate a little opening in a vent we suspect was knocked loose during the recent re-roofing extravaganza. As J was nailing screen over the opening, the local building inspector happened to come by for his final inspection of the new roof. I casually mentioned to him we’d found a bat and that J was in the process of securing the house from future invasions. The inspector said, "Oh. Uh-huh. Hmmmm….Well, I sure hope there’s no live ones up there. They’ll get trapped, die and stink to high heaven for months."

Thanks for that Mr. Building Inspector. Thanks for that.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,717 other followers