Late last night J gently took my hand, gazed tenderly into my eyes, brushed a stray lock of hair off my cheek (or maybe he was swatting away a mosquito, I’m not sure) and said softly into my ear:
"You really ought to blog this."
And who am I to deny him?
While watching Robin Williams rave manically through an interview on television a few nights ago, J mentioned that he’s never seen "The Birdcage," a hilarious movie Williams made in 1996. Not wanting my favorite person in the world to be culturally stunted, I ran right out and rented the DVD so we could watch it last night. We had a few laughs and, overall, enjoyed it very much though we weren’t exactly bowled over by the cinematic experience (his tastes run more towards thrillers and gore while I’m all about "Airplane!" and "Raising Arizona." Yes, things can get testy for us at Blockbuster).
The movie is about two gay men in South Beach who try to play it straight for their son’s ultra-conservative, soon-to-be-in-laws. With Robin Williams, Nathan Lane and Hank Azaria in the cast, it was (of course) over the top and completely outrageous. We got to wondering how the gay community felt about the film and then started talking about how its stereotypical portrayal of gay men isn’t really that different from how other subgroups are sometimes stereotyped (often unfairly) in movies and especially on television. I offhandedly mentioned that I hoped viewers with limited exposure to the gay community wouldn’t use that movie as a cultural reference point any more than someone would use the current dreck on television as an accurate representation of white, middle class America. And then I winced.
Does TV accurately portray white, middle class America? My god, I hope not. If so, then all men are flabby, overweight buffoons incapable of caring for children or fixing dinner without Emeril’s assistance. All women are size three, bubble-headed ditzes who’s sole purpose in life is to perfect the eye-rolls and exasperated sighs they must dish out whenever they’re within ten feet of a man. All children are either smart-mouthed brats or snobbish geeks with pocket protectors. According to what the television shows us, white, middle class Americans are nothing more than under-educated, NASCAR watching, country music loving, Pabst-swilling, dolts with nothing better to than sit around flinging verbal (and unfunny) barbs at each other while moaning about how much they hate work (oh, wait….sorry, that’s Wanker).
Obviously, all men are not dolts, all women are not ditzes and all children are not brats. But I thought a large part of television programming was supposed to represent current culture as it really is. If sitcoms like "Everybody Loves Raymond" and "The King of Queens" or reality shows like "Big Brother" and "The Real World" accurately portray white America, then where the hell have I been? I know plenty of men who are great fathers, lots of women who are successful and intelligent and…uh, one or two kids that aren’t brats. Then again, I suppose, a sitcom or reality show about my life would be top-drawer boring. So I can only surmise that these kinds of shows make it on the air because people find them …entertaining?…funny…what? Why is it funny to see people in that (my?) particular subgroup portrayed as idiots or fools? When I think about it, it’s not funny to see any particular subgroup portrayed as idiots or fools but the white, middle class Americans seem to have the market cornered at the moment.
Anyway, my point is this: I don’t think that "The Birdcage" is an accurate representation of the gay community any more than I think "Chico & The Man" or "Sanford & Son" is an accurate representation of the Hispanic or Black community. I am left to wonder, however, if other subgroups look at the current offerings on TV and think, "yeah, that’s about right." God, I hope not.